Book review

This Immortal Review

Conrad Nomikos guides the alien Myshtigo across a post-nuclear Earth while concealing powers and history that make tourism, ownership, and survival inseparable.

Author
Roger Zelazny
First published
1966
Cover image for This Immortal
Cover image served by Open Library; edition artwork may differ from the reviewed text.
View source https://openlibrary.org/works/OL13994W

This Immortal review: who owns a wounded Earth

This This Immortal review argues that Roger Zelazny's short novel is strongest when Conrad Nomikos's uncertain identity becomes inseparable from the status of Earth. After catastrophic war and outside intervention, the planet is damaged, depopulated, visited, and partly treated as an asset. Conrad must escort the Vegan visitor Myshtigo through ruins and dangerous landscapes while different human factions disagree about cooperation, resistance, and survival.

The book combines science fiction with Greek myth, travel narrative, and postcolonial anxiety, making the history and ideas frame equally useful. Its compressed energy is a strength: every stop tests whether preservation means guarding monuments, protecting people, controlling a story, or refusing alien ownership. The same compression leaves politics and relationships less developed than its central image deserves.

Conrad Nomikos narrates through disguise

Conrad speaks with wit, irritation, cultural memory, and strategic omission. His scarred appearance makes other characters read him too quickly, while hints about his age and abilities resist an ordinary biography. He may resemble figures from Greek myth without settling into one allegorical identity. Uncertainty becomes part of his power.

That narrative control is attractive and limiting. Conrad can turn danger into a joke and history into anecdote, protecting himself from scrutiny. Readers share his perspective but not all his knowledge. The result is a protagonist whose charm cannot be separated from withholding. His possible immortality matters less as a puzzle than as an ethical pressure: what obligations accumulate when someone may outlast institutions and catastrophes?

Myshtigo arrives as visitor, evaluator, and threat

Myshtigo is a Vegan whose proposed journey across Earth is never just tourism. His observations may affect how powerful outsiders understand the planet's future. Human companions therefore debate whether he should be guided, manipulated, resisted, or killed. Hospitality and surveillance occupy the same itinerary.

The novel gains tension by refusing to make Myshtigo a single symbol. He represents alien power, yet he also possesses curiosity and judgments not reducible to a colonial office. Conrad must decide whether protecting him serves Earth or betrays it. The escort relationship tests whether dialogue is possible when material power is radically unequal.

Earthoffice turns culture into jurisdiction

Conrad's work for Earthoffice connects preservation to bureaucracy. Monuments, arts, and surviving sites require care after devastation, but naming something heritage can also place it under an authority. The office stands between salvage and administration, attempting to keep a human claim legible in a world where ownership has shifted.

This role suits Conrad because he values particular places rather than an abstract planet alone. Ruins are evidence of lives, violence, craft, and memory. The book asks whether a damaged culture can become a museum for stronger visitors while its remaining people lose the right to determine use. Conservation without sovereignty may preserve objects and abandon a world.

The Radpol makes resistance morally unstable

The Radpol opposes alien influence and presses for human control. Its anger has an intelligible source: Earth has endured disaster and now faces the possibility of becoming commodity, spectacle, or subordinate territory. Resistance answers humiliation with a claim that survival requires refusal.

Yet violence against Myshtigo can also sacrifice future possibilities and reproduce the coercion it opposes. Zelazny does not make every resistant motive noble or every collaborator corrupt. Conrad stands in the uncomfortable middle, protecting an alien visitor while retaining fierce loyalty to Earth. His position keeps the political argument from becoming a choice between purity and surrender.

A travel party creates incompatible motives

The journey gathers people who do not agree about Myshtigo, Conrad, or Earth's future. Companionship therefore never guarantees trust. Old relationships, hired violence, political loyalty, and personal curiosity travel together through landscapes that can expose weakness without clarifying motive.

The moving group gives the novel rapid changes of tension, but the short length means some members register through function more than interior development. Conrad's voice dominates. Readers who want a fully distributed ensemble may find the supporting cast thin, especially when compared with the complexity of the political situation.

Greek landscape becomes memory rather than backdrop

Zelazny uses Mediterranean places, names, and mythic echoes to connect future devastation with older cycles of conquest and survival. Conrad's relation to Greece is bodily and cultural. The landscape can seem to recognize him even when official histories cannot account for his duration. Myth supplies a vocabulary for recurrence without proving that the gods literally explain events.

This fusion is one of the novel's signatures. It can also slide toward exotic shorthand when culture is concentrated in flamboyant names, ruins, monsters, or masculine prowess. The strongest passages make antiquity a living claim on the future. The weaker ones use it as a fast signal of mystery.

Mutation makes catastrophe visible in bodies

The damaged Earth contains altered creatures and people whose existence records the material aftermath of war. Danger is not confined to abandoned buildings. Radiation and ecological disruption have changed what can live and how. Conrad's unusual body occupies this field ambiguously: he may be a survivor, exception, throwback, or something older.

The adventure sometimes treats mutation as spectacle or threat, a period convention that can narrow sympathy. Still, bodily change prevents the novel from making apocalypse purely scenic. Political arguments about ownership take place among lives already transformed by decisions made before the journey began.

The earlier title clarifies the book's center

The novel first appeared in serialized form as ...And Call Me Conrad before book publication as This Immortal. The two titles emphasize different questions. One foregrounds naming and the difficulty of fixing Conrad's identity; the other announces duration while leaving the subject and terms uncertain.

Together they point away from a simple secret. Whether Conrad fits a familiar category matters less than what he does with continuity. Immortality without care would be mere endurance. Conrad's attachment to Earth, however compromised, turns survival into stewardship and political responsibility.

Style moves faster than explanation

Zelazny's prose is compressed, allusive, and confident that readers can infer missing connections. Dialogue moves quickly from threat to humor. Mythological references appear without lectures, and action can interrupt political reflection before an issue is settled. That speed produces vividness rare in longer world-building.

It also produces gaps. The history of alien-human relations, the exact structure of authority, and several personal bonds could sustain far more development. Readers who prefer exhaustive systems may experience the book as underexplained. Readers drawn to New Wave science fiction may value how voice and image carry conceptual weight.

Gender and period limitations narrow the future

The novel imagines radical changes in planetary power more readily than equal complexity for women. Female characters have relationships, loyalties, and abilities, but Conrad's masculine charisma and the adventure's danger dominate the emotional field. Some cultural descriptions and jokes also show the period in ways that can feel reductive now.

These limitations matter because the book asks who may represent Earth. A future defended primarily through exceptional men reproduces exclusions within its anti-colonial claim. Admiring Conrad's voice should not require treating every person around him as adequate to the role the narrative assigns.

Reader fit, comparisons, and final judgment

This is best for readers who enjoy brief, idea-dense science fiction, unreliable charisma, mythic reference, and post-apocalyptic travel. Violence, assassination attempts, radiation damage, mutation, and colonial power shape the action. The rapid sequence can make emotional transitions abrupt.

For another speculative encounter between unequal civilizations, compare The Mote in God's Eye Review. Ecotopia Review offers a very different traveler's confrontation with a society whose land and political future outsiders wish to interpret.

This Immortal endures because Conrad Nomikos, Myshtigo, Earthoffice, the Radpol, the wounded Greek landscape, and the question of alien ownership converge within a remarkably short book. Its politics are suggestive rather than complete, and its supporting lives receive uneven depth. Yet Conrad's ambiguous longevity gives the adventure a durable core: survival is not valuable only because one person continues. It matters when continuity protects a place from being reduced to somebody else's attraction.

Related reading

Continue the shelf